Washington, Oct. 26 (BUS) – The idea of Democrats to tax new billionaires to help pay for social services and President Joe Biden’s climate change plan was quickly criticized as too onerous, with some lawmakers favoring the original plan simply to raise higher tax rates on corporations and the wealthy.
Biden said Monday that he hopes talks with Congress will finalize a comprehensive package agreement this week. His net worth is at least $1.75 trillion, and it could be more than that. Biden said it would be “very, very positive that this is done” before he departs for two world summits abroad.
“That’s my hope,” the president said before leaving Delaware on a trip to New Jersey to highlight the package’s child care proposals and related infrastructure measures. “Praise be to God and the goodwill of the neighbors.”
Resolving the revenue side is key as Democrats scale back what was a $3.5 trillion plan, insisting that all new spending be paid in full and not build up debt. Biden pledges that any new taxes will only affect the wealthy, those who earn more than $400,000 a year, or $450,000 for married couples, according to the Associated Press.
The White House had to reconsider its tax strategy after a key Democrat, Senator Kirsten Senema, D-Arizona, objected to her party’s initial proposal to raise tax rates on wealthy Americans by rolling back Trump-era tax cuts for those whose income exceeds 400 thousand dollars. . Sinema also opposed raising the corporate tax rate of 21%. With the Senate by 50-50, Biden has no votes to bring into his party.
Instead, to win over Cinema and others, the White House has been coming up with a new idea of taxing billionaire assets and one that would require companies to pay a minimum 15% tax, regardless of whether any profits would appear. Both appear to be gaining traction with another pivotal Democrat, Senator Joe Manchin, of DW.Va, who told reporters he supports new ways to ensure the wealthy pay their “fair share.”
Democrats on the Senate Finance Committee, led by Senator Ron Wyden of Oregon, are ready to roll out the tax revenue plan within days. It will likely include other tax measures to increase revenue, including a plan to strengthen the IRS to prosecute tax offenders.
“This is the gist of it: Americans have read over the past few months that billionaires have been paying little or no tax for years on end,” Wyden said at the Capitol.
The billionaire tax is modeled on Wyden’s 2019 bill to treat assets as income. Senator Elizabeth Warren, a Democrat, has proposed another idea, a very rich 3% surcharge.
Under the emerging Wyden plan, the billionaire tax would hit the richest Americans, fewer than 1,000 people. It would require those with assets of more than $1 billion, or income over three consecutive years of $100 million, to pay taxes on stock gains and other tradable assets, rather than waiting for the property to sell.
A similar billionaire tax will apply to non-tradable assets, including real estate, but will be deferred with no tax assessed until the asset is sold.
Generally, the tax rate for billionaires has not been set, but the capital gains rate is expected to be at least 20%. Democrats said it could raise $200 billion in proceeds that could help fund the Biden package over 10 years.
Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell called it a “disingenuous scheme” and warned that revenue could dry up during recessions. Some Republicans suggested that such a tax plan could be challenged in court.
But his fellow Democrats are also raising concerns, saying that the idea of simply rolling back the 2017 tax cuts by raising higher rates has been more straightforward and transparent.
Under the House bill from the Ways and Means Committee, the top individual income tax rate would rise from 37% to 39.6%, on those earning more than $400,000, or $450,000 for married couples. The company’s price will increase from 21% to 26.5%. The bill also proposed an additional 3% tax on the wealthiest Americans whose average income exceeds $5 million annually.
The committee chair, Representative Richard Neal, Democrat of Massachusetts, said he told Wyden in Monday’s debate that implementing the senator’s proposed billionaire plan “presents a bit more of a challenge.”
Neil suggested that the House motion was not on the table despite Cinema’s objections. In fact, he said, “Our plan is looking better every day.”
Once Democrats approve the tax proposals, they can assess how much funding is available for Biden’s comprehensive package to expand health care, child care and other climate change programs.
Democrats had hoped Biden would report major achievements to world leaders later this week. They also face an October 31 deadline to pass a bipartisan $1 trillion package of related infrastructure from roads, broadband and other public works before routine federal transportation funds expire.
“We need to get that done,” Biden said in remarks at a New Jersey transit center.
After months of start-and-stop negotiations, Biden’s overall package is now seen as at least $1.75 trillion. But it could still rise significantly higher, according to another person who insisted on anonymity to discuss private conversations.
Biden met with conservative West Virginia Democrat Manchin and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer at the president’s Delaware home on Sunday as they work to resolve differences between centrists and progressives that have stalled the bill.
Disputes over far-reaching investments remain, including plans to expand Medicare coverage with dental benefits and hearing and vision aids for seniors; child care assistance; free kindergarten; and a new four-week paid family leave program.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said she expects to reach a deal by the end of the week, paving the way for a House vote on the bipartisan trillion-dollar infrastructure bill. The Senate approved it over the summer, but the action stalled during deliberations on Biden’s broader bill.
But Representative Pramila Jayapal of Washington state and chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus whose support will be crucial to both bills, said lawmakers want more than just a framework for Biden’s plan before they vote for the smaller infrastructure package.
“We want the whole bill,” Jayapal told The Associated Press. “We want to vote on both projects at the same time.”
RAE